header-logo header-logo

Extending support to US colleagues

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Rule of law
printer mail-detail
The Law Society and Bar Council have endorsed a Europe-wide statement of support for US lawyers targeted by President Donald Trump’s administration.

Since March, President Trump has been putting pressure on certain law firms and lawyers he views as hostile to his policies. His administration has threatened to impeach and disbar judges whose decisions they don’t like, and issued executive orders and memorandums to limit or revoke law firms’ security clearances, and deny lawyers access to federal buildings and facilities.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has also written to 20 law firms in March, informing them their diversity, equity and inclusion practices have been placed under investigation.

Last week, the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), representing more than one million lawyers, collectively expressed their support for US colleagues.

‘The efforts of any government to use power to punish individuals and law firms based on their representation of clients or their legal positions are a clear violation of the core principle of legal independence,’ their statement read.

‘The CCBE echoes the American Bar Association's firm rejection of these practices. Lawyers have a duty to act in the best interest of their clients, and no lawyer should face retaliation for fulfilling this duty.’

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The political attacks on independent legal practitioners, the rule of law and the judiciary are abhorrent.

‘We offer our total support to the American Bar Association and our colleagues who are facing such unprecedented challenges and threats. The Bar Council of England and Wales condemns all acts of intimidation and the targeting of lawyers who are simply carrying out their work, often acting in the public interest and upholding our professional ethics.’

Some 500 law firms, including the US branch of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer—the only global elite firm to do so—have signed an amicus brief in support of Perkins Coie, which is the subject of executive orders suspending its security clearance and reviewing its government contracts.

Washington-based top 50 firm Perkins Coie, along with Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, are suing the Trump administration. 

Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Rule of law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll