header-logo header-logo

Extending support to US colleagues

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Rule of law
printer mail-detail
The Law Society and Bar Council have endorsed a Europe-wide statement of support for US lawyers targeted by President Donald Trump’s administration.

Since March, President Trump has been putting pressure on certain law firms and lawyers he views as hostile to his policies. His administration has threatened to impeach and disbar judges whose decisions they don’t like, and issued executive orders and memorandums to limit or revoke law firms’ security clearances, and deny lawyers access to federal buildings and facilities.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has also written to 20 law firms in March, informing them their diversity, equity and inclusion practices have been placed under investigation.

Last week, the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), representing more than one million lawyers, collectively expressed their support for US colleagues.

‘The efforts of any government to use power to punish individuals and law firms based on their representation of clients or their legal positions are a clear violation of the core principle of legal independence,’ their statement read.

‘The CCBE echoes the American Bar Association's firm rejection of these practices. Lawyers have a duty to act in the best interest of their clients, and no lawyer should face retaliation for fulfilling this duty.’

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The political attacks on independent legal practitioners, the rule of law and the judiciary are abhorrent.

‘We offer our total support to the American Bar Association and our colleagues who are facing such unprecedented challenges and threats. The Bar Council of England and Wales condemns all acts of intimidation and the targeting of lawyers who are simply carrying out their work, often acting in the public interest and upholding our professional ethics.’

Some 500 law firms, including the US branch of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer—the only global elite firm to do so—have signed an amicus brief in support of Perkins Coie, which is the subject of executive orders suspending its security clearance and reviewing its government contracts.

Washington-based top 50 firm Perkins Coie, along with Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, are suing the Trump administration. 

Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Rule of law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll