header-logo header-logo

Extradition

29 June 2012
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

BH (AP) and another v Lord Advocate and another (Scotland); KAS or H (AP) v Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 24, [2012] All ER (D) 126 (Jun)

The approach adopted to Art 8 rights in extradition cases did not have to be radically different from that adopted in deportation or expulsion cases. The public interest in giving effect to a request for extradition was a constant factor in cases of that kind. Great weight would always have to be given to it, and the more serious the offence the greater would be that weight. The question, so far as the Art 8 right was concerned, was the same in both cases. Even in decisions concerning separation of parents from their children for deportation, detention or imprisonment, the best interests of the child had to be a primary consideration. The starting point was to assess whether the children’s best interests were outweighed by the strength of any other considerations. However, that did not require the decision-taker always to examine the interest of the children at the very

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll