header-logo header-logo

31 May 2012
Issue: 7516 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition—Extradition order—Appeals

Lukaszewski v District Court in Torun, Poland and other appeals; R (on the application of Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, [2012] All ER (D) 178 (May)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 23 May 2012

The court considered four appeals relating to the requirements for notices of appeal under the Extradition Act 2003 (EA 2003).

The first three appellants (L, P and R) were Polish citizens who were the subject of a European arrest warrant. They each sought to appeal against a decision of the magistrates’ court ordering their extradition to Poland. Whilst remanded in custody, they were assisted by a prison officer working in the prison’s legal services department to complete a form, N161 notice of appeal. The department faxed the notices of appeals to the Administrative Court for filing and stamping. The department then faxed to the CPS a copy of the sealed front page together with a cover sheet within the seven-day permitted period proscribed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll