header-logo header-logo

18 March 2022 / Nick Vamos
Issue: 7971 / Categories: Features , Extradition
printer mail-detail

Extradition has no place for political games

75148
Nick Vamos suggests the home secretary sailed close to the wind when trying to delay Michael Lynch’s extradition
  • Raises questions about the Home Secretary’s decision to try to delay the extradition of ‘British Bill Gates’ Autonomy founder, Dr Michael Lynch.
  • Suggests the Home Secretary’s conduct ‘comes worryingly close to political interference’.

Until 2012, Dr Michael Lynch was Chief Executive Officer of Autonomy, a company he founded in 1996. Autonomy had developed highly successful software for storing and searching ‘unstructured data’ such as voicemail and email. In October 2011, Autonomy was sold to Hewlett Packard (HP), the US tech giant, in a deal that valued the company at £7.4bn. Dr Lynch reportedly made £500m from the sale and was hailed as the ‘British Bill Gates’.

In March 2015, however, HP commenced proceedings in the High Court alleging Lynch had dishonestly inflated Autonomy’s value by more than £5bn, leading to what is thought to be the UK’s biggest ever civil fraud trial. In September 2019, the US government requested Lynch’s extradition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll