header-logo header-logo

18 March 2022 / Nick Vamos
Issue: 7971 / Categories: Features , Extradition
printer mail-detail

Extradition has no place for political games

75148
Nick Vamos suggests the home secretary sailed close to the wind when trying to delay Michael Lynch’s extradition
  • Raises questions about the Home Secretary’s decision to try to delay the extradition of ‘British Bill Gates’ Autonomy founder, Dr Michael Lynch.
  • Suggests the Home Secretary’s conduct ‘comes worryingly close to political interference’.

Until 2012, Dr Michael Lynch was Chief Executive Officer of Autonomy, a company he founded in 1996. Autonomy had developed highly successful software for storing and searching ‘unstructured data’ such as voicemail and email. In October 2011, Autonomy was sold to Hewlett Packard (HP), the US tech giant, in a deal that valued the company at £7.4bn. Dr Lynch reportedly made £500m from the sale and was hailed as the ‘British Bill Gates’.

In March 2015, however, HP commenced proceedings in the High Court alleging Lynch had dishonestly inflated Autonomy’s value by more than £5bn, leading to what is thought to be the UK’s biggest ever civil fraud trial. In September 2019, the US government requested Lynch’s extradition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll