header-logo header-logo

Extradition has no place for political games

18 March 2022 / Nick Vamos
Issue: 7971 / Categories: Features , Extradition
printer mail-detail
75148
Nick Vamos suggests the home secretary sailed close to the wind when trying to delay Michael Lynch’s extradition
  • Raises questions about the Home Secretary’s decision to try to delay the extradition of ‘British Bill Gates’ Autonomy founder, Dr Michael Lynch.
  • Suggests the Home Secretary’s conduct ‘comes worryingly close to political interference’.

Until 2012, Dr Michael Lynch was Chief Executive Officer of Autonomy, a company he founded in 1996. Autonomy had developed highly successful software for storing and searching ‘unstructured data’ such as voicemail and email. In October 2011, Autonomy was sold to Hewlett Packard (HP), the US tech giant, in a deal that valued the company at £7.4bn. Dr Lynch reportedly made £500m from the sale and was hailed as the ‘British Bill Gates’.

In March 2015, however, HP commenced proceedings in the High Court alleging Lynch had dishonestly inflated Autonomy’s value by more than £5bn, leading to what is thought to be the UK’s biggest ever civil fraud trial. In September 2019, the US government requested Lynch’s extradition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll