header-logo header-logo

Face value?

11 December 2008 / Evelyn Reid
Issue: 7349 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

What happens when surveyors are hoodwinked into valuing the wrong property? Evelyn Reid reports

How was it that a surveyor was misled into valuing the wrong property? That was only one of the questions raised in Platform Funding Ltd v Bank of Scotland Plc (formerly Halifax Plc) [2008] EWCA Civ 930, [2008] All ER (D) 422 (Jul) a case which had all the ingredients for confusion and deceit.

The claimant, Platform Funding Ltd, had been approached by a borrower for a loan to be secured by a mortgage on 1 Bakers Yard, Belchmire Lane, Gosberton, Lincolnshire. The defendant, the Bank of Scotland plc (formerly Halifax plc) but at the relevant time trading as Colleys, purportedly provided Platform Funding Ltd with a valuation of the property, and it advanced a sum of money to the borrower based on that valuation.

Shell shock
The valuer’s report contained a certificate stating that the property had been inspected by the valuer, and the valuation given was a fair indication of the current open market valuation. The borrower’s address as stated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll