header-logo header-logo

Fact Finding Hearings in private children proceedings

10 December 2021 / Kim Beatson , Victoria Rylatt
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
66825
In the first of a two-part series, Kim Beatson & Victoria Brown provide an expert guide to split hearings
  • A cut out and keep guide to Fact Finding Hearings in private children proceedings.
  • The definitions of domestic abuse, the burden of proof as well as evidential and practical issues.

A ‘Fact Finding Hearing’ (FFH) is the first limb of a split hearing, which is a hearing divided into two parts. In the first half, the court makes findings of fact on issues identified by the parties or the court and recorded in a Scott Schedule. During the second part, the court decides the case based on the findings.

When are they held?

An FFH is not always necessary. Practice Direction 12J of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (PD 12J) contains detailed guidance on determining whether or not it is necessary to conduct an FFH with respect to allegations of domestic abuse.

Often there will be a clear and stark issue such as sexual or serious physical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll