header-logo header-logo

Fact Finding Hearings in private children proceedings

10 December 2021 / Kim Beatson , Victoria Rylatt
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
66825
In the first of a two-part series, Kim Beatson & Victoria Brown provide an expert guide to split hearings
  • A cut out and keep guide to Fact Finding Hearings in private children proceedings.
  • The definitions of domestic abuse, the burden of proof as well as evidential and practical issues.

A ‘Fact Finding Hearing’ (FFH) is the first limb of a split hearing, which is a hearing divided into two parts. In the first half, the court makes findings of fact on issues identified by the parties or the court and recorded in a Scott Schedule. During the second part, the court decides the case based on the findings.

When are they held?

An FFH is not always necessary. Practice Direction 12J of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (PD 12J) contains detailed guidance on determining whether or not it is necessary to conduct an FFH with respect to allegations of domestic abuse.

Often there will be a clear and stark issue such as sexual or serious physical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll