header-logo header-logo

Factual possession

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

William Byrne sheds some light on uncertainties in adverse possession

Just outside Wymondham in Norfolk there stands a now derelict animal feed mill. The mill sits on the northern four acres of a 10-acre plot. The remaining six or so acres to the south (identified at trial as “the orange land”) bounds open farm land on three sides and, since at least the 1960s, was traditionally cultivated by a local farmer with permission from the mill owners.

In March 1974, the claimant, J Alston & Sons Limited, purchased a local farm and was given the opportunity to farm the orange land with the permission of the mill owner, Barkers & Lee Smith (Norfolk) Limited. Barkers nevertheless wanted to retain the ability to expand the mill into it should the need arise. They had no wish to cross swords with the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 and, to this end, they insisted upon written confirmation from Alan Alston, the owner of the J Alston & Sons, that he would possess the land as a “mere licensee, paying no rent” and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
back-to-top-scroll