header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Factual possession

William Byrne sheds some light on uncertainties in adverse possession

Just outside Wymondham in Norfolk there stands a now derelict animal feed mill. The mill sits on the northern four acres of a 10-acre plot. The remaining six or so acres to the south (identified at trial as “the orange land”) bounds open farm land on three sides and, since at least the 1960s, was traditionally cultivated by a local farmer with permission from the mill owners.

In March 1974, the claimant, J Alston & Sons Limited, purchased a local farm and was given the opportunity to farm the orange land with the permission of the mill owner, Barkers & Lee Smith (Norfolk) Limited. Barkers nevertheless wanted to retain the ability to expand the mill into it should the need arise. They had no wish to cross swords with the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 and, to this end, they insisted upon written confirmation from Alan Alston, the owner of the J Alston & Sons, that he would possess the land as a “mere licensee, paying no rent” and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll