header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Factual possession

William Byrne sheds some light on uncertainties in adverse possession

Just outside Wymondham in Norfolk there stands a now derelict animal feed mill. The mill sits on the northern four acres of a 10-acre plot. The remaining six or so acres to the south (identified at trial as “the orange land”) bounds open farm land on three sides and, since at least the 1960s, was traditionally cultivated by a local farmer with permission from the mill owners.

In March 1974, the claimant, J Alston & Sons Limited, purchased a local farm and was given the opportunity to farm the orange land with the permission of the mill owner, Barkers & Lee Smith (Norfolk) Limited. Barkers nevertheless wanted to retain the ability to expand the mill into it should the need arise. They had no wish to cross swords with the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 and, to this end, they insisted upon written confirmation from Alan Alston, the owner of the J Alston & Sons, that he would possess the land as a “mere licensee, paying no rent” and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll