header-logo header-logo

Fairytale of New York: product liability law in the UK

03 December 2020 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
33611
Now more than ever before, it is crucial that UK litigators find new ways to hold Big Pharma to account, argues Sarah Moore
  • A recent ‘forum non conveniens’ judgment in New York describes the UK as a hostile jurisdiction for claimants seeking to hold Big Pharma to account.
  • Many lawyers in the UK will recognise the accuracy of that description and the systemic issues that have prevented claimants being more successful against Big Pharma in the UK.
  • In the context of a global pandemic and an under-resourced NHS, UK litigators must find new ways to hold Big Pharma to account within the UK court system.

In the dog days of this year’s lockdown spring, when the ‘new normal’ still felt abnormal, a quiet revolution was beginning in the world of UK product liability. On 18 March 2020, a New York court ruled that a British woman, Mrs Fletcher, could litigate her product liability claim against New York-registered defendants, Estee Lauder Inc and Clinique Laboratories

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll