header-logo header-logo

18 May 2018
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Fake house sale alert

Court holds that solicitors can be liable in house scam cases

Solicitors on both sides can be held responsible for losses incurred in fake house sale scams, according to a landmark Court of Appeal judgment in two joined cases.

Dreamvar UK v Mishcon de Reya & Mary Monson Solicitors [2018] EWCA Civ 1082 concerned property developer Dreamvar’s purchase of a £1.1m mews house. Mishcon acted for the buyer. Mary Monson acted for the vendor. Neither solicitor ever met the vendor, who took fake identity documents to a third firm of solicitors for certification on behalf of Mary Monson.

Only once the sale exchanged and completed was it discovered that the vendor was a fraudster who had impersonated the real owner.

Dreamvar sued Mishcon for negligence and breach of trust and claimed against Mary Monson for breaches of warranty of authority, trust and undertaking. Mishcon claimed against Mary Monson for breaches of trust, undertaking and agency agreement.

The Court of Appeal agreed that Mishcon had acted honestly and reasonably, which meant the court could grant relief against the firm’s breach of trust. However, it declined to do so in view of the catastrophic effect of the fraud on Dreamvar.

The court also found Mary Monson liable for a breach of undertaking, and ordered both firms to share the liability to Dreamvar.

Jerome O’Sullivan, partner at Healys, who acted for Dreamvar, said: ‘Solicitors should review the terms and conditions of their retainers in light of this ruling.

‘When acting for the purchaser, solicitors should make it expressly clear that they will rely on the vendor’s solicitor’s reasonable checks to verify the identity of their client. When acting for the vendor, solicitors should review their exclusion clauses.’

In the second case, solicitors Owen White & Catlin (OWC), who acted for a fraudulent seller, were held liable to repay property company P&P more than £1m that it paid for a property. OWC were found to have held the money on trust for P&P and transferred it in breach of trust since no genuine completion took place.

Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll