header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
18 March 2010 / Andrew Dodd , Louisa Albertini
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

False alarm?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

BSkyB ruling rings alarm bells for IT suppliers. Andrew Dodd & Louisa Albertini explain why

In a landmark court ruling on 26 January 2010, a judge has ruled in favour of BSkyB in its bitterly contested £710m legal battle with EDS. Mr Justice Ramsey found that EDS had fraudulently misrepresented to BSkyB the timescales in which it could deliver a new customer relationship management (CRM) system for BSkyB.

The judgment will cause reverberations in the IT industry. In establishing fraudulent misrepresentation, BSkyB blew a hole through the £30m liability cap in its contract with EDS. Its precise damages figure will be assessed by the court in a separate hearing. Preliminary indications, however, are that it will comfortably exceed £200m.

Problems from the start

EDS successfully tendered in 2000 for the design and implementation of a new CRM system for BSkyB. The £46m project was quickly beset by difficulties. After successive renegotiations in 2001 and 2002, there was an acrimonious parting of ways in 2002. BSkyB paused for breath and consulted its lawyers.

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Uber’s legal shield faces scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
NLJ this week: Is it finally time to scrap Part III?
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
NLJ this week: Hereditary peers era finally comes to an end
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
NLJ this week: Courts tighten scrutiny of AI and public power
Artificial intelligence, proportionality and public decision-making are under increasing judicial scrutiny, according to the latest public law round-up from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
NLJ this week: Why handshake property deals rarely survive court
Families relying on informal agreements over property ownership could face costly consequences if disputes arise, the High Court has warned
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll