header-logo header-logo

18 March 2010 / Andrew Dodd , Louisa Albertini
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

False alarm?

BSkyB ruling rings alarm bells for IT suppliers. Andrew Dodd & Louisa Albertini explain why

In a landmark court ruling on 26 January 2010, a judge has ruled in favour of BSkyB in its bitterly contested £710m legal battle with EDS. Mr Justice Ramsey found that EDS had fraudulently misrepresented to BSkyB the timescales in which it could deliver a new customer relationship management (CRM) system for BSkyB.

The judgment will cause reverberations in the IT industry. In establishing fraudulent misrepresentation, BSkyB blew a hole through the £30m liability cap in its contract with EDS. Its precise damages figure will be assessed by the court in a separate hearing. Preliminary indications, however, are that it will comfortably exceed £200m.

Problems from the start

EDS successfully tendered in 2000 for the design and implementation of a new CRM system for BSkyB. The £46m project was quickly beset by difficulties. After successive renegotiations in 2001 and 2002, there was an acrimonious parting of ways in 2002. BSkyB paused for breath and consulted its lawyers.

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll