header-logo header-logo

False alarm?

18 March 2010 / Andrew Dodd , Louisa Albertini
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

BSkyB ruling rings alarm bells for IT suppliers. Andrew Dodd & Louisa Albertini explain why

In a landmark court ruling on 26 January 2010, a judge has ruled in favour of BSkyB in its bitterly contested £710m legal battle with EDS. Mr Justice Ramsey found that EDS had fraudulently misrepresented to BSkyB the timescales in which it could deliver a new customer relationship management (CRM) system for BSkyB.

The judgment will cause reverberations in the IT industry. In establishing fraudulent misrepresentation, BSkyB blew a hole through the £30m liability cap in its contract with EDS. Its precise damages figure will be assessed by the court in a separate hearing. Preliminary indications, however, are that it will comfortably exceed £200m.

Problems from the start

EDS successfully tendered in 2000 for the design and implementation of a new CRM system for BSkyB. The £46m project was quickly beset by difficulties. After successive renegotiations in 2001 and 2002, there was an acrimonious parting of ways in 2002. BSkyB paused for breath and consulted its lawyers.

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll