header-logo header-logo

Family

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re B (children) (adoption) [2011] EWCA Civ 729, [2011] All ER (D) 159 (Jun)

A judge had jurisdiction to make an injunction to prevent the removal of children in short-term foster placements by the local authority, pending the hearing of an application for an adoption order. In determining whether to make the injunction, the judge should pose to himself, and seek to answer, an initial question as follows:

(a) was there a real prospect that the foster parents would establish that the authority’s decision to remove the children from them notwithstanding that they wished to adopt them was, by reference to public law principles, irrational, disproportionate or otherwise unlawful or was otherwise in breach of their rights, or those of the adopters or of those of the children under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. If the judge’s answer to question (a) was negative, he should refuse to grant the injunction. However, if his answer to the question was affirmative, he should proceed to address further questions which, without purporting to be prescriptive, might run along

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll