header-logo header-logo

Family concern over litigants in person

03 December 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers’ prime worry is the rise in litigants in person

One in five family lawyers cite the increased numbers of litigants in person (LiPs) as their prime concern and a sizeable majority think pensions will become increasingly important when dividing up a couple’s finances, new research shows.

The top issues for family lawyers, according to the annual Grant Thornton Matrimonial Survey, are LiPs (according to 21% of respondents), the lack of legal aid for most family law cases (17%) and courts not being fit for purpose (14%).

The results of the survey mirror those of previous years. Respondents were asked about the areas in which they would like to see a change in legislation. As in 2014, one quarter of lawyers would like to see no-fault divorces introduced, followed by the reintroduction of Calderbank offers generally in financial proceedings (20%) and protection for cohabiting couples (19%).

Divorcing couples have been given greater flexibility over their financial assets by the pensions legislation. More than three-quarters of respondents believe pensions will become more important in reaching financial settlements. However, 62% of solicitors think pensions will be treated as a more liquid asset only in cases where one or more of parties is over 55 years, and only 18% feel pensions will be treated as a more liquid asset in all cases.

Nick Andrews, partner at Grant Thornton UK, says: “The introduction of the single Family Court last year was a revolutionary step, yet professionals still remain concerned that the court system is not fit for purpose to support LiPs.”

Jo Edwards, chair of family law organisation Resolution, says she is not surprised by the survey results and that the lack of funding for legal representation is leading to “higher conflict during divorce”.

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll