header-logo header-logo

Family: Establishing paternity

12 March 2009 / Lorraine A Jones
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Lorraine Jones unravels the complexities of paternity testing

Paternity law cases are prevalent in the public law arena and many cases dealing with issues of paternity have been decided by the judges in cases giving us specific guidance on the taking and obtaining of blood tests.

However, increasingly family lawyers are being asked to advise upon issues of paternity not just in public law but also for private individuals. This involves fathers who may wish to establish the paternity of a child where they have doubt that the child may be their own, as well as mothers who do not know who the father is because of multiple relationships, or an opportune meeting or intimacy. Another category which is often not included is the child as an adult.

The search process

It is generally accepted that if a child needs to establish its paternity it can do so with the help of an adult and the appointment of a litigation friend in making an application; in certain cases the official solicitor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll