header-logo header-logo

Family: Establishing paternity

12 March 2009 / Lorraine A Jones
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Lorraine Jones unravels the complexities of paternity testing

Paternity law cases are prevalent in the public law arena and many cases dealing with issues of paternity have been decided by the judges in cases giving us specific guidance on the taking and obtaining of blood tests.

However, increasingly family lawyers are being asked to advise upon issues of paternity not just in public law but also for private individuals. This involves fathers who may wish to establish the paternity of a child where they have doubt that the child may be their own, as well as mothers who do not know who the father is because of multiple relationships, or an opportune meeting or intimacy. Another category which is often not included is the child as an adult.

The search process

It is generally accepted that if a child needs to establish its paternity it can do so with the help of an adult and the appointment of a litigation friend in making an application; in certain cases the official solicitor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll