header-logo header-logo

Family finances: a delayed reaction

11 July 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

How long can a spouse or civil partner wait to take financial proceedings? David Burrows sifts the evidence

  • Does delay in issue of financial relief proceedings have any effect on the outcome of any later claim?
  • Does it make any difference if a couple had an agreement at the time of their much earlier separation?
  • Can either spouse apply to strike out a delayed claim?

How many cases are there in existence where a couple with (say) two dependent children (in this case, eight and ten) separate after a thirteen-year marriage? They agree that the wife (Anne) will look after the children. She will keep the house (subject to the outstanding mortgage) and will pay the mortgage. She will make no claim on her former husband (Brian) for child support maintenance (or ‘periodical payments’ under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) s 23) for the children.

The couple take no formal legal advice on this arrangement. They do nothing to confirm their agreement in a court order following their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll