header-logo header-logo

Family finances: a delayed reaction

11 July 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

How long can a spouse or civil partner wait to take financial proceedings? David Burrows sifts the evidence

  • Does delay in issue of financial relief proceedings have any effect on the outcome of any later claim?
  • Does it make any difference if a couple had an agreement at the time of their much earlier separation?
  • Can either spouse apply to strike out a delayed claim?

How many cases are there in existence where a couple with (say) two dependent children (in this case, eight and ten) separate after a thirteen-year marriage? They agree that the wife (Anne) will look after the children. She will keep the house (subject to the outstanding mortgage) and will pay the mortgage. She will make no claim on her former husband (Brian) for child support maintenance (or ‘periodical payments’ under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) s 23) for the children.

The couple take no formal legal advice on this arrangement. They do nothing to confirm their agreement in a court order following their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll