header-logo header-logo

Family finances: a delayed reaction

11 July 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

How long can a spouse or civil partner wait to take financial proceedings? David Burrows sifts the evidence

  • Does delay in issue of financial relief proceedings have any effect on the outcome of any later claim?
  • Does it make any difference if a couple had an agreement at the time of their much earlier separation?
  • Can either spouse apply to strike out a delayed claim?

How many cases are there in existence where a couple with (say) two dependent children (in this case, eight and ten) separate after a thirteen-year marriage? They agree that the wife (Anne) will look after the children. She will keep the house (subject to the outstanding mortgage) and will pay the mortgage. She will make no claim on her former husband (Brian) for child support maintenance (or ‘periodical payments’ under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) s 23) for the children.

The couple take no formal legal advice on this arrangement. They do nothing to confirm their agreement in a court order following their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll