header-logo header-logo

12 June 2026 / Kate Stovold
Issue: 8165 / Categories: Features , Family , Dispute resolution , Divorce , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Family justice beyond the courtroom

252173
© Getty images
The rise of non-court dispute resolution in family law is a necessity, not a trend, writes Kate Stovold
  • Non-court dispute resolution (NCDR) is becoming the default pathway in family law, driven by court delays and increasing demand for faster, more predictable outcomes.
  • As NCDR grows, lawyers play a critical role in ensuring private processes remain fair, safe and suitable for the families they serve.

Historically, non-court dispute resolution (NCDR) in family law disputes was viewed as a possible alternative to litigation rather than its obvious substitute. It was explored only when the parties could be readily signposted rather than relied upon as the primary route to a family-focused outcome. In 2026, however, that view feels increasingly outdated, and rightly so, as more families turn to NCDR to resolve matters and, importantly, lawyers are signposting appropriately to ensure that their clients’ best interests are served.

As a lawyer who says (and actually means) that court must always be seen as a last resort in family law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll