header-logo header-logo

12 June 2026 / Kate Stovold
Issue: 8165 / Categories: Features , Family , Dispute resolution , Divorce , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Family justice beyond the courtroom

252173
© Getty images
The rise of non-court dispute resolution in family law is a necessity, not a trend, writes Kate Stovold
  • Non-court dispute resolution (NCDR) is becoming the default pathway in family law, driven by court delays and increasing demand for faster, more predictable outcomes.
  • As NCDR grows, lawyers play a critical role in ensuring private processes remain fair, safe and suitable for the families they serve.

Historically, non-court dispute resolution (NCDR) in family law disputes was viewed as a possible alternative to litigation rather than its obvious substitute. It was explored only when the parties could be readily signposted rather than relied upon as the primary route to a family-focused outcome. In 2026, however, that view feels increasingly outdated, and rightly so, as more families turn to NCDR to resolve matters and, importantly, lawyers are signposting appropriately to ensure that their clients’ best interests are served.

As a lawyer who says (and actually means) that court must always be seen as a last resort in family law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll