header-logo header-logo

04 April 2008
Issue: 7315 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

FAMILY LAW

B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 543, [2008] All ER (D) 282 (Mar)

Lord Justice Wall said that the “big money” cases which have reached the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords are of very limited assistance in dealing with smaller cases in which there is simply not enough money to go round. In every case the court must ask itself two questions:

(i) is the outcome fair in all the circumstances of the case and

(ii) is it in any way discriminatory? The court must follow White v White [2001] 1 All ER 1, and look at the extent to which the court has departed from equality. But this latter exercise is a check: the primary objectives remain fairness and an absence of discrimination.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll