Caudle v LD Law Ltd [2008] EWHC 374 (QB), [2008] All ER (D) 435 (Feb)
B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 543, [2008] All ER (D) 282 (Mar)
R v Ngyuen [2008] EWCA Crim 585, [2008] All ER (D) 267 (Mar)
R (on the application of Kelly and another) v Secretary of State for Justice Re Gibson [2008] EWCA Civ 177, [2008] All ER (D) 172 (Mar)
Drake v Harbour [2008] EWCA Civ 25, [2008] All ER (D) 283 (Jan)
R (on the application of Edwards- Sayer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 467 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 176 (Mar)
R (Thornhill) v Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 508 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 08 (Mar)
R (White) v Crown Court at Blackfriars [2008] EWHC 510 (Admin)
R (H) v Guildford Youth Court [2008] All ER (D) 02 (Mar)
DPP v Cooper [2008] All ER (D) 03 (Mar)
Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on
Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team
Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment
An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ