Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T [2008] EWCA Civ 199, [2008] All ER (D) 298 (Mar)
R v Khan [2008] EWCA Crim 531, [2008] All ER (D) 212 (Mar)
Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 181, [2008]All ER (D) 132 (Mar)
R v Kiely [2008] EWCA Crim 536
R (White) v Crown Court at Blackfriars [2008] EWHC 510 (Admin)
Lichter & Schwarz v Rubin [2008] EWHC 450 (Ch D)
James Carleton Seventh Earl of Malmesbury and others v Strutt and Parker (a partnership) [2008] EWHC 424 (QB), [2008] All ER (D) 257 (Mar)
City of Westminster Social and Community Services Department v C and another [2008] EWCA Civ 198, [2008] All ER (D) 276 (Mar)
The importance of implementing the letter of the law should not be underestimated, say Peter Wilcock and Joel Bennathan QC
News In Brief
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
Sidley—Jeremy Trinder
Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London
Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ
