Lichter & Schwarz v Rubin [2008] EWHC 450 (Ch D)
On an interim application for the disclosure of “information about relevant property or assets which are or may be the subject of an application for a freezing injunction”, pursuant to CPR 25.1(1)(g), it is necessary to show only a reasonable possibility, based on credible evidence, that there will be such an application.
Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees
Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes
Specialist associate solicitor rejoins Muckle’s leading employment team
