header-logo header-logo

24 May 2013
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family law—Procedure—Striking out

Wyatt v Vince [2013] EWCA Civ 495, [2013] All ER (D) 96 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Justice Thorpe, Lord Justice Jackson & Lord Justice Tomlinson, 8 May 2013

The court should adopt the same broad approach to the interpretation and application of r 4.4(1)(b) of the Family Procedure Rules (FPR) as in relation to CPR 3.4(2)(b) in the context of civil proceedings.

Philip Cayford QC (instructed by Mishcon De Reya) for the wife. Martin Pointer QC, Geoffrey Kingscote and Simon Webster (instructed by Schillings) for the husband.

The parties married in December 1981. At the time they had neither assets nor income. A son, D, had been born in May 1981. The wife already had a daughter, E, born in 1979, whom the husband accepted into the family. They separated in about 1984. The wife moved to Lowestoft where she survived on state benefits. The husband housed himself in Bath in an old ambulance. The husband had a new relationship in the late 1980s; there was one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll