header-logo header-logo

Family mediation: it’s good to talk

06 December 2024 / David Emmerson OBE
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Family , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail
200348
Changes to the FPR are resulting in more referrals to mediation. David Emmerson OBE explores the new provisions & their impact on practitioners & clients
  • Sets out the changes to the FPR, which came in earlier this year, and discusses in detail private financial dispute resolutions and early neutral evaluations, including their benefits and differences.

Important changes were introduced in April 2024 to the Family Procedure Rules (FPR), in particular to FPR Pt 3, which has been underused. The family court has wide powers and:

(i) FPR 1.4(1) provides that the court ‘must further the overriding objective by actively managing cases’; and

(ii) FPR 1.4(2)(f) states that active case management includes ‘encouraging the parties to use a non-court dispute resolution procedure if the court considers that appropriate and facilitating the use of such procedure’.

The definition of ‘non-court dispute resolution’ (NCDR) at FPR 2.3(1)(b) was widened to mean:

‘methods of resolving a dispute other than through the court process, including but not limited to mediation, arbitration, evaluation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll