header-logo header-logo

30 September 2016
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Re L (a child) (jurisdiction) [2016] EWCA Civ 821, [2016] All ER (D) 67 (Sep)

The Court of Appeal held that the appeal would be allowed in a case where the father of a child, A, appealed against final orders which an English court had made in relation to the care of A. In the circumstances, the English court had had no jurisdiction to make final orders, because there had not been a valid request made under Art 15 of Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003 to transfer jurisdiction from the French court and, without such a request, there had been no basis for the English court to have exercised substantive jurisdiction in relation to A.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll