Family proceedings

C and another v E and others [2016] EWHC 2643 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 33 (Nov)

The Family Division held that it was not in a position to make either a parental order under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, as the element of consent was missing, or an adoption order under s 67(1) Adoption and Children Act 2002, as it would mean in effect that the parents were adopting their own children. The applications were not able to be determined.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Family proceedings

Issue: 7722 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court

C and another v E and others [2016] EWHC 2643 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 33 (Nov)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS

Read All

Specialist courtrooms to prioritise rape cases

Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court

NLJ this week: Employment law’s four-point check

The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause

NLJ this week: Privacy meets the courtroom

Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation

NLJ this week: Telecoms tenants caught in a legal gap

A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws

The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations

Error message

Family proceedings

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client