header-logo header-logo

Family proceedings

31 January 2014
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re C (a child) (guidance on proceedings involving profoundly deaf parent) [2014] All ER (D) 128 (Jan)

The court issued guidance on the approach to be taken by professionals, local authorities, legal advisers, the court service and judges in cases involving a parent or parents who were profoundly deaf. The following issues should be considered:

  1. It was the duty of those who acted for a parent who had a hearing disability to identify that issue at the earliest opportunity;
  2. Those acting for the parent and the local authority should make the issue known to the court at the time the proceedings were issued;
  3. It should be a matter of course for there to be the provision, at the case management hearing, of expert advice on the impact of the deaf parent’s ability to be fully involved in the case. An application to instruct such an expert should be properly constructed in accordance with the Family Procedure Rules 2010;
  4. Funding needs had to be grappled with both before and during the case management hearing. Funding intervention to
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll