header-logo header-logo

Family proceedings

03 February 2017
Issue: 7732 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re A and others (Children) (Adoption) [2017] EWHC 35 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 55 (Jan)

The Family Division ruled on preliminary points raised in the context of applications for adoption, by prospective adoptive parents who lived in England, of Scottish children, in relation to each of whom a Scottish Sheriff had made a permanence order with authority to adopt, under ss 80 and 83 of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007. Among other things, the court held that the English court had jurisdiction to make adoption orders in the context of the present case, that the English court should recognise the Scottish orders and that, applying settled law, and on the true construction of s 105 of the Adoption of Children Acts 2002, as amended, the English court did not need to obtain consent of the natural parent(s) before making an adoption order, under s 47 of the 2002 Act, because the natural parents no longer had parental responsibility in respect of the children in question.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

Mike Wilson, managing partner of Blake Morgan chair of the CBI’s South-East Council, reflects on his career the challenges that have defined him

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Partner joins commercial property team in Birmingham

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Family team expands with double appointment in Bristol office

NEWS
Lawyers have expressed dismay at the Chancellor Rachel Reeve’s decision to impose a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions
NLJ is inviting its readers to take part in this year’s annual reader research, a short survey designed to help shape the future direction of the magazine. The questionnaire consists of just eight quick questions and offers an opportunity for legal professionals to share their views on the content, coverage and issues that matter most to them.
The Law Society has urged regulators not to ban the term ‘no win no fee’, as the profession contemplates measures to prevent a disaster like the SSB Group collapse from happening again
The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest
CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has been granted permission to appeal Mazur, a decision which has caused consternation among litigation firms
back-to-top-scroll