header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Re C (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 980, [2017] All ER (D) 94 (Jul)

Under the Hague Convention 1980, wrongful retention could occur before the previously agreed date of return (anticipatory retention) and whether anticipatory retention had occurred was a question of fact to be resolved by reference to the evidence of the circumstances. In the light of that finding the Court of Appeal, Civil Division held that the judge had failed to consider or address that key issue when considering whether the ‘circumstances surrounding the children’s applications for British citizenship’ amounted to ‘anticipatory retention. The case would be returned for a rehearing.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
The criminal courts will sit to their maximum capacity next year, after the Lord Chancellor David Lammy lifted the cap on Crown Court sitting days
The Lord Chancellor David Lammy has set out his plans for ‘Blitz courts’, a national listing framework and other elements of the Leveson reforms
A former Commerzbank analyst has been sentenced to eight months in prison for lying during an employment tribunal hearing
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has joined with 60 data protection authorities from around the world to call for ‘urgent regulatory attention’ to the dangers of artificial intelligence (AI)
Consumers’ association Which? has applied to withdraw from its five-year £480m class action against smartphone chipset provider Qualcomm, following an agreement between the parties
back-to-top-scroll