header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings—Interim care order—Findings of fact by judge

Re S (a child) (care order: fact finding) [2010] EWCA Civ 1363, [2010] All ER (D) 91 (Dec)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Nicholas Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ, 7 Dec 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) applications in care proceedings.

Sally Bradley QC and Lindy Armitage for the authority. Sarah Singleton QC and Vicki James for the mother. Guy Swiffen for the guardian.

S was born in prison in August 2009. In November 2009, the local authority instituted care proceedings and sought an interim care order. The mother had been observed feeding the baby in a dangerous manner known as “prop feeding” on a number of occasions. When the authority learned of that, it instructed the prison authorities to call the police to separate S from her mother under a police protection order. On 11 December 2009, an interim care order was made. The judge also made a number of findings of fact which were critical of the authority.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll