header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 December 2010
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings—Interim care order—Findings of fact by judge

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Re S (a child) (care order: fact finding) [2010] EWCA Civ 1363, [2010] All ER (D) 91 (Dec)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Nicholas Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ, 7 Dec 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) applications in care proceedings.

Sally Bradley QC and Lindy Armitage for the authority. Sarah Singleton QC and Vicki James for the mother. Guy Swiffen for the guardian.

S was born in prison in August 2009. In November 2009, the local authority instituted care proceedings and sought an interim care order. The mother had been observed feeding the baby in a dangerous manner known as “prop feeding” on a number of occasions. When the authority learned of that, it instructed the prison authorities to call the police to separate S from her mother under a police protection order. On 11 December 2009, an interim care order was made. The judge also made a number of findings of fact which were critical of the authority.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
NLJ this week: Landlords’ forced entry powers spark legal divide
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll