header-logo header-logo

Family proceedings—Orders in family proceedings—Parental responsibility order and contact order

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Principal Reporter v K and others [2010] UKSC 56, [2010] All ER (D) 192 (Dec)

Family proceedings—Orders in family proceedings—Parental responsibility order and contact order

Principal Reporter v K and others [2010] UKSC 56, [2010] All ER (D) 192 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Sir John Dyson SCJ, 15 Dec 2010

The operation of s 93(2)(b) of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 (CSA 1995) in defining persons entitled to participate in a children’s hearing is not compatible with Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Janys Scott QC and Alison Stirling (instructed by Drummond Miller WS) for K. Morag Wise QC and Lynda Brabender (instructed by Biggart Baillie LLP) for the Principal Reporter. Rosemary Guinnane and David Sheldon (instructed by Aitken Nairn WS) for JR. David Johnston QC and Roddy Dunlop QC (instructed by the Scottish Government Legal Directorate) for the first minuter. Marie Helen Clark (instructed by HBM Sayers) for the second minuter.

K and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll