header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings—Orders in family proceedings—Parental responsibility order and contact order

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Principal Reporter v K and others [2010] UKSC 56, [2010] All ER (D) 192 (Dec)

Family proceedings—Orders in family proceedings—Parental responsibility order and contact order

Principal Reporter v K and others [2010] UKSC 56, [2010] All ER (D) 192 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Sir John Dyson SCJ, 15 Dec 2010

The operation of s 93(2)(b) of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 (CSA 1995) in defining persons entitled to participate in a children’s hearing is not compatible with Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Janys Scott QC and Alison Stirling (instructed by Drummond Miller WS) for K. Morag Wise QC and Lynda Brabender (instructed by Biggart Baillie LLP) for the Principal Reporter. Rosemary Guinnane and David Sheldon (instructed by Aitken Nairn WS) for JR. David Johnston QC and Roddy Dunlop QC (instructed by the Scottish Government Legal Directorate) for the first minuter. Marie Helen Clark (instructed by HBM Sayers) for the second minuter.

K and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll