header-logo header-logo

06 April 2009 / Geraldine Morris
Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Family: Times they are a-changin'

Geraldine Morris on calls for a major transformation of divorce laws

At the National Conference of the family lawyers' association, Resolution, last month there was a call for a radical overhaul of the law relating to divorce. Two key areas were highlighted: no-fault divorce and the current uncertainty surrounding financial settlements. The key legislation, the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), has been amended many times since its implementation but is it still fit for purpose?

In addition to spousal provisions, civil partnerships should be considered. The implementation of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) was radical in its application to same-sex relationships but reactionary in its mirroring of the provisions of the MCA 1973 as to both the dissolution and financial provisions.

No fault divorce/dissolution

Progress came to a standstill in 1973 and many would argue that legislation which was originally debated in the 1960's has little relevance to modern families. Under current law anyone who doesn't want to wait two

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll