header-logo header-logo

06 April 2009 / Geraldine Morris
Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Family: Times they are a-changin'

Geraldine Morris on calls for a major transformation of divorce laws

At the National Conference of the family lawyers' association, Resolution, last month there was a call for a radical overhaul of the law relating to divorce. Two key areas were highlighted: no-fault divorce and the current uncertainty surrounding financial settlements. The key legislation, the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), has been amended many times since its implementation but is it still fit for purpose?

In addition to spousal provisions, civil partnerships should be considered. The implementation of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) was radical in its application to same-sex relationships but reactionary in its mirroring of the provisions of the MCA 1973 as to both the dissolution and financial provisions.

No fault divorce/dissolution

Progress came to a standstill in 1973 and many would argue that legislation which was originally debated in the 1960's has little relevance to modern families. Under current law anyone who doesn't want to wait two

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll