header-logo header-logo

Fanning the flames

06 August 2009 / Tom Welch
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Is the most recent attack on the Burqa a sign of religious hostility behind a veil of liberalism? asks Tim Welch

The headscarf row has again ignited in France with a fresh attack on the Burqa, which the French see as symbolic of extremism and oppressive on women.

President Nicholas Sarkozy recently argued in front of an agreeable audience in his first state of the nation address that the Burqa is “not a religious symbol, but a sign of subservience and debasement”.

However, such arguments are weak and misconceived.

Many women freely choose to wear the Burqa as a manifestation of their religious belief.

Sarkozy argued that the Burqa is “not a religious symbol”, yet he is wholly unqualified to interpret the theological premise of Islamic dress and prohibition is in itself oppressive. In a liberal society the state has no place in dictating how people dress in the street, particularly when this restricts their right to manifestation of religious belief.

The real threat to liberal values comes not from the Burqa, but from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll