header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009 / Tom Welch
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Fanning the flames

Is the most recent attack on the Burqa a sign of religious hostility behind a veil of liberalism? asks Tim Welch

The headscarf row has again ignited in France with a fresh attack on the Burqa, which the French see as symbolic of extremism and oppressive on women.

President Nicholas Sarkozy recently argued in front of an agreeable audience in his first state of the nation address that the Burqa is “not a religious symbol, but a sign of subservience and debasement”.

However, such arguments are weak and misconceived.

Many women freely choose to wear the Burqa as a manifestation of their religious belief.

Sarkozy argued that the Burqa is “not a religious symbol”, yet he is wholly unqualified to interpret the theological premise of Islamic dress and prohibition is in itself oppressive. In a liberal society the state has no place in dictating how people dress in the street, particularly when this restricts their right to manifestation of religious belief.

The real threat to liberal values comes not from the Burqa, but from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll