header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009 / Tom Welch
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Fanning the flames

Is the most recent attack on the Burqa a sign of religious hostility behind a veil of liberalism? asks Tim Welch

The headscarf row has again ignited in France with a fresh attack on the Burqa, which the French see as symbolic of extremism and oppressive on women.

President Nicholas Sarkozy recently argued in front of an agreeable audience in his first state of the nation address that the Burqa is “not a religious symbol, but a sign of subservience and debasement”.

However, such arguments are weak and misconceived.

Many women freely choose to wear the Burqa as a manifestation of their religious belief.

Sarkozy argued that the Burqa is “not a religious symbol”, yet he is wholly unqualified to interpret the theological premise of Islamic dress and prohibition is in itself oppressive. In a liberal society the state has no place in dictating how people dress in the street, particularly when this restricts their right to manifestation of religious belief.

The real threat to liberal values comes not from the Burqa, but from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll