header-logo header-logo

Fatal distraction

08 April 2016 / Daniel Kavan
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Employment
printer mail-detail
istock_000033647750_web

When does killing time at work become an invasion of privacy, asks Daniel Kavan

In my previous career as a lawyer, before I started working in e-discovery some eight years ago, I often used to send personal e-mails from my work e-mail account. Sometimes they included jokes which may have embarrassed me if read by someone else, especially out of context. But now I never send personal e-mails from my work account. Not even innocent messages to my mum. Years of working on investigations and litigation matters where entire corporate mailboxes—including extremely personal e-mails—were reviewed by teams of lawyers, have cured me of any naivety on this subject: someone will trawl through my work mailbox one day. But what if they could also access everything I write on my personal webmail, including instant chats?

Business or pleasure?

While the nationals of some European countries, for example Germany and France, have an expectation of privacy even in their work e-mails (and investigations which require the reading of such e-mails require permission of the individual custodian of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll