header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016 / Daniel Kavan
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fatal distraction

istock_000033647750_web

When does killing time at work become an invasion of privacy, asks Daniel Kavan

In my previous career as a lawyer, before I started working in e-discovery some eight years ago, I often used to send personal e-mails from my work e-mail account. Sometimes they included jokes which may have embarrassed me if read by someone else, especially out of context. But now I never send personal e-mails from my work account. Not even innocent messages to my mum. Years of working on investigations and litigation matters where entire corporate mailboxes—including extremely personal e-mails—were reviewed by teams of lawyers, have cured me of any naivety on this subject: someone will trawl through my work mailbox one day. But what if they could also access everything I write on my personal webmail, including instant chats?

Business or pleasure?

While the nationals of some European countries, for example Germany and France, have an expectation of privacy even in their work e-mails (and investigations which require the reading of such e-mails require permission of the individual custodian of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll