header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016 / Daniel Kavan
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fatal distraction

istock_000033647750_web

When does killing time at work become an invasion of privacy, asks Daniel Kavan

In my previous career as a lawyer, before I started working in e-discovery some eight years ago, I often used to send personal e-mails from my work e-mail account. Sometimes they included jokes which may have embarrassed me if read by someone else, especially out of context. But now I never send personal e-mails from my work account. Not even innocent messages to my mum. Years of working on investigations and litigation matters where entire corporate mailboxes—including extremely personal e-mails—were reviewed by teams of lawyers, have cured me of any naivety on this subject: someone will trawl through my work mailbox one day. But what if they could also access everything I write on my personal webmail, including instant chats?

Business or pleasure?

While the nationals of some European countries, for example Germany and France, have an expectation of privacy even in their work e-mails (and investigations which require the reading of such e-mails require permission of the individual custodian of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll