header-logo header-logo

29 July 2016 / James Goudkamp , Donal Nolan
Issue: 7709 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Fault lines

nlj_7709_goudkamp_nolan_3

James Goudkamp & Donal Nolan study contributory negligence in practice

  • How often does a plea of contributory negligence succeed?

  • By what percentage are damages discounted when a claimant is found guilty of contributory negligence?

  • How do certain variables affect the outcome of the claim?

The doctrine of contributory negligence reduces the compensation which the victim of a wrong receives where the victim was partly to blame for his or her own damage. It is of immense practical importance, and is frequently relied on by defendants both in litigation and in negotiating settlements. Damages are regularly discounted for contributory negligence by substantial amounts (often as much as 50%). However, despite the doctrine’s significance, there has never been a comprehensive empirical analysis of its operation in the courts.

In an effort to improve understanding of how the doctrine works in practice, we carried out such a study, focusing on courts of first instance. In this article we highlight some of the key results. A fuller report of the results of our study can

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll