header-logo header-logo

29 July 2016 / James Goudkamp , Donal Nolan
Issue: 7709 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Fault lines

nlj_7709_goudkamp_nolan_3

James Goudkamp & Donal Nolan study contributory negligence in practice

  • How often does a plea of contributory negligence succeed?

  • By what percentage are damages discounted when a claimant is found guilty of contributory negligence?

  • How do certain variables affect the outcome of the claim?

The doctrine of contributory negligence reduces the compensation which the victim of a wrong receives where the victim was partly to blame for his or her own damage. It is of immense practical importance, and is frequently relied on by defendants both in litigation and in negotiating settlements. Damages are regularly discounted for contributory negligence by substantial amounts (often as much as 50%). However, despite the doctrine’s significance, there has never been a comprehensive empirical analysis of its operation in the courts.

In an effort to improve understanding of how the doctrine works in practice, we carried out such a study, focusing on courts of first instance. In this article we highlight some of the key results. A fuller report of the results of our study can

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll