header-logo header-logo

Fears over head injury pilot scheme

10 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers have raised concerns about the suspected inflicted head injury service (SIHIS), currently being piloted at NHS trusts in Birmingham, Manchester & Sheffield

The SIHIS aims to reduce delays in assessing children aged eight years or under with suspected abusive head injuries by bringing expert clinicians together at a clinical hub to provide a single, uniform report. The Department for Education (DoE) pilot is scheduled to run until the end of March 2025.

However, lawyers have highlighted the lack of transparency, information and consultation about the pilot and warned clinical experts may not be cross-examined in court.

Child protection solicitor Max Konarek, partner at GT Stewart Solicitors, said: ‘The majority of the cases I have personally been involved in where a party has been absolved of any wrongdoing, have involved the successful cross-examination of the medical experts instructed.

Konarek urged all interested lawyers to attend remotely an open meeting of the Family Justice Council on the subject on 22 July. Registration closes on 16 July. The DoE was unable to comment at the time of going to press.

Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Expert Witness
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
back-to-top-scroll