header-logo header-logo

21 May 2009 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fee simple?

Part six: Mark Solon discusses disputes over experts' fees

Disputes over payment of fees are probably the most common cause of conflict between experts and solicitors, particularly arguments about quotations and estimates, payment for work additional to the report, late or nonpayment by the solicitor, disbursements incurred by the expert and cancellation fees.

Agreeing fees with the expert prior to instruction

The contract

It is essential to agree the basis on which the expert will be paid before instructions are confirmed. The expert's terms and conditions, your letter in reply (or theirs if they issue terms of engagement) and your letter of instructions form the contract. Ideally, both the solicitor and the expert should sign their acceptance of the terms, including the fees. Some experts will use or adapt the model terms of engagement published by the expert witness organisations. The terms recommended by the Expert Witness Institute and by the Academy of Experts can be found on their websites at www.ewi.org.uk and www.academyofexperts.org. If the expert sends you their terms and you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll