21 May 2009 / Mark Solon

Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession

printer

mail-detail

Fee simple?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Part six: Mark Solon discusses disputes over experts' fees

Disputes over payment of fees are probably the most common cause of conflict between experts and solicitors, particularly arguments about quotations and estimates, payment for work additional to the report, late or nonpayment by the solicitor, disbursements incurred by the expert and cancellation fees.

Agreeing fees with the expert prior to instruction

The contract

It is essential to agree the basis on which the expert will be paid before instructions are confirmed. The expert's terms and conditions, your letter in reply (or theirs if they issue terms of engagement) and your letter of instructions form the contract. Ideally, both the solicitor and the expert should sign their acceptance of the terms, including the fees. Some experts will use or adapt the model terms of engagement published by the expert witness organisations. The terms recommended by the Expert Witness Institute and by the Academy of Experts can be found on their websites at www.ewi.org.uk and www.academyofexperts.org. If the expert sends you their terms and you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Fee simple?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Part six: Mark Solon discusses disputes over experts' fees

Disputes over payment of fees are probably the most common cause of conflict between experts and solicitors, particularly arguments about quotations and estimates, payment for work additional to the report, late or nonpayment by the solicitor, disbursements incurred by the expert and cancellation fees.

Agreeing fees with the expert prior to instruction

The contract

It is essential to agree the basis on which the expert will be paid before instructions are confirmed. The expert's terms and conditions, your letter in reply (or theirs if they issue terms of engagement) and your letter of instructions form the contract. Ideally, both the solicitor and the expert should sign their acceptance of the terms, including the fees. Some experts will use or adapt the model terms of engagement published by the expert witness organisations. The terms recommended by the Expert Witness Institute and by the Academy of Experts can be found on their websites at www.ewi.org.uk and www.academyofexperts.org. If the expert sends you their terms and you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

back-to-top-scroll