header-logo header-logo

Fee simple?

21 May 2009 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Part six: Mark Solon discusses disputes over experts' fees

Disputes over payment of fees are probably the most common cause of conflict between experts and solicitors, particularly arguments about quotations and estimates, payment for work additional to the report, late or nonpayment by the solicitor, disbursements incurred by the expert and cancellation fees.

Agreeing fees with the expert prior to instruction

The contract

It is essential to agree the basis on which the expert will be paid before instructions are confirmed. The expert's terms and conditions, your letter in reply (or theirs if they issue terms of engagement) and your letter of instructions form the contract. Ideally, both the solicitor and the expert should sign their acceptance of the terms, including the fees. Some experts will use or adapt the model terms of engagement published by the expert witness organisations. The terms recommended by the Expert Witness Institute and by the Academy of Experts can be found on their websites at www.ewi.org.uk and www.academyofexperts.org. If the expert sends you their terms and you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Property litigation practice strengthened by partner hire

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

International arbitration team specialist joins the team

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll