header-logo header-logo

Fees to be cut for RTA cases

21 November 2012
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

PI lawyers “appalled” by Ministry of Justice RTA portal proposals

Lawyers’ fees for road traffic accident cases are to plummet from £1,200 to £500 for claims worth up to £10,000, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said.

The change is due to be introduced to RTA portal claims in April. RTA cases worth up to £25,000 will have a maximum fee of £800.

Fees for employers’ liability and public liability cases—due to be handled through the electronic portal from April onwards—will be capped at £900 for claims worth up to £10,000, and £1,600 for claims worth up to £25,000.

Justice minister Helen Grant says: “We are making changes so claims are handled quickly and efficiently and accident victims with genuine cases can be compensated as soon as possible.

“These changes, along with our wider reforms, will bring more balance to the system, make lawyers’ costs proportionate and in turn create an environment where insurers can pass on savings to their customers through lower premiums.”

She asked for responses to be made by 4 January 2013.

However, Karl Tonks, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL), says: “We’re appalled by these proposals, which are wholly damaging to the interests of injured people.

“A fee of £1,600 for an employers’ liability case valued up to £25,000 is not at all reflective of the work involved and serves to cut independent legal advice from the system. Alternatively, injured people will have to pay for legal advice out of the compensation that they need.

“Consultation on how the new employers’ liability and public liability systems will operate is still underway and cases have not been openly costed, so how these fees could have been fairly calculated is a mystery.”

APIL has instructed Kingsley Napley solicitors and issued a letter before action to the MoJ with a view to launching a judicial review over the extension of the RTA claims process. The MoJ has until the end of this week (23 November) to respond.

APIL chief executive Deborah Evans said: “We are extremely concerned that the mechanisms which will make the portal extensions work efficiently cannot be put in place in time.”

Issue: 7539 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll