header-logo header-logo

Fees challenge fails

12 February 2014
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Court rejects union’s argument that tribunal fees are unlawful

Unison has lost its legal challenge against the introduction of employment tribunal and employment appeal fees.

In R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), the union argued the fees, which were introduced in July, are indirectly discriminatory and unlawful because they are prohibitively expensive to employees on an average wage and therefore impact on their right to a fair hearing. 

The Lord Chancellor countered that fees were offered on a sliding scale to reduce the impact on poorer claimants or exempt them from having to pay fees.

Rejecting Unison’s arguments, the court held that proceedings would not be so expensive as to be “virtually impossible or excessively difficult” but noted that the Lord Chancellor is to closely monitor the situation and take remedial measures if a discriminatory impact is felt.

Irwin Mitchell partner, Tom Flanagan says: “In effect, therefore, the application was rejected on the basis that it is simply too soon to assess the impact of the fees regime. 

“The court had been asked to consider substantial evidence, much of it concerning hypothetical claimants and the predicted effect that charging fees would have on their ability to bring claims.”

Geoffrey Mead, partner at Eversheds, says: “The government will doubtless breathe a huge sigh of relief, given that it had already pledged, in the context of Scottish judicial review proceedings, that any fees previously paid would be reimbursed if the challenge were successful.”

Dave Prentis, general secretary of Unison, says he will appeal. He added: “We provided clear evidence that since the fees were introduced, the number of employment tribunal cases has collapsed.”

 

Issue: 7594 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll