header-logo header-logo

26 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-detail

Fees uplift a 'necessary first step'

Barristers have welcomed a 25% rise in rates for counsel taking on work for central government after 1 April.

Some of the rates for the Attorney General’s civil panel counsel have not been increased since the panels were introduced in 1997. Last April, the Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association reported that rates would have doubled had they kept pace with inflation. The rates will now be reviewed every two years.

Bar Council chair, Barbara Mills KC said: ‘We welcome this uplift in fees for counsel but, given that the rates have not been increased in more than 20 years, they have fallen very far behind inflation. We regard this as a necessary first step but further uplifts will be required if the government is to attract barristers to this important work.’

Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll