header-logo header-logo

18 July 2014
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Fiduciary

Novoship (UK) Ltd and others v Nikitin and others [2014] EWCA Civ 908, [2014] All ER (D) 63 (Jul)

Where a claim based on equitable wrongdoing was made against one who was not a fiduciary, as in the case of a fiduciary sued for breach of an equitable (but non-fiduciary) obligation, there was no reason why the common law rules of causation, remoteness and measure of damages should not be applied by analogy. Those rules did not apply to the case of a fiduciary sued for breach of a fiduciary duty, but that was because the two cases were different. The remedy of an account of profits was available against one who dishonestly assisted a fiduciary to breach his fiduciary obligations, even if that breach did not involve a misapplication of trust property.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll