header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Fighting for liberty

Roger Smith salutes two judicial superstars with impeccable human rights credentials

Mary Robinson may be the nearest that the law has to an international superstar. Thus, the former President of Ireland and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights was a good person for the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) to pick as its President and one of its ambassadors for the release of its report on counterterrorism and human rights, Assessing Damage, Urging Action.

Ms Robinson was one of three authors of the report to launch it in London— after Geneva and before New York. The provisions of international human rights and humanitarian law, said the ICJ panel, were unchanged by whatever happened on 9/11. States must continue to pay heed to crucial issues such as the prohibition on torture. Above all, the jurists argued, use of the language of “war on terror” was misguided: the war paradigm encouraged abuse of human rights and the rule of law.

The report contained little which would not be expected from an international body representing judges and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll