header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Fighting for liberty

Roger Smith salutes two judicial superstars with impeccable human rights credentials

Mary Robinson may be the nearest that the law has to an international superstar. Thus, the former President of Ireland and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights was a good person for the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) to pick as its President and one of its ambassadors for the release of its report on counterterrorism and human rights, Assessing Damage, Urging Action.

Ms Robinson was one of three authors of the report to launch it in London— after Geneva and before New York. The provisions of international human rights and humanitarian law, said the ICJ panel, were unchanged by whatever happened on 9/11. States must continue to pay heed to crucial issues such as the prohibition on torture. Above all, the jurists argued, use of the language of “war on terror” was misguided: the war paradigm encouraged abuse of human rights and the rule of law.

The report contained little which would not be expected from an international body representing judges and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll