header-logo header-logo

Final protester evicted

02 May 2012
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Peace protestor loses High Court challenge against new rules

Parliament Square’s last peace protester has lost her High Court challenge against new rules barring people from setting up camp in the area.

Westminster Council has powers under Pt 3 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, ss 143 and 145, to stop any “prohibited activity”, including the erection of “tents” or “other structure that is designed, or adapted…for the purpose of facilitating, sleeping or staying in a place for any period”.

Maria Gallastegui, a peace campaigner who has been involved in the Parliament Square protests for 10 years and lived on-site for six years, argued this breached her Arts 10 and 11 rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. She claimed she would be unable to continue her protest because she would not be able to travel from her home in Eastbourne every day, in Gallastegui (R, on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2012] EWHC 1123 (Admin).

However, Sir John Thomas and Mr Justice Silber said the rules were “limited and proportionate” and did not breach the Human Rights Act.

Silber J said: “It is clear that the existing legislation did not achieve the legislative objective of ensuring the people did not camp and sleep in Parliament Square. We therefore conclude that the provisions in ss 143 and 145 of the Act are proportionate.”

Issue: 7512 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll