header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / David Burrows
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Family , Costs , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Finance on Family Breakdown

The Practitioner

Permission to Appeal out of Time: Barder

Permission to appeal against ancillary relief orders (after Barder v Barder (Caluori intervening) [1988] AC 20, [1987] 2 FLR 480, HL) has been in the reports recently; but in two cases which only emphasise that, for such an application to succeed, the circumstances must be exceptional.

In B v B [2007] EWHC 2472 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 404 (Oct) a house was sold by H, and to his advantage, for appreciably more than its valuation at the time of the ancillary relief hearing. He had carried out an extensive amount of refurbishment. In those circumstances Sir Mark Potter P held that the increase in price was “by no means inordinate given the value of the works effected by the husband”. He refused W's Barder application.

Barder had concerned a mother who retained the parties' former home under a consent order, then unlawfully killed the two

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll