header-logo header-logo

Finance on Family Breakdown

01 May 2008 / David Burrows
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Family , Costs , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

The Practitioner

Permission to Appeal out of Time: Barder

Permission to appeal against ancillary relief orders (after Barder v Barder (Caluori intervening) [1988] AC 20, [1987] 2 FLR 480, HL) has been in the reports recently; but in two cases which only emphasise that, for such an application to succeed, the circumstances must be exceptional.

In B v B [2007] EWHC 2472 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 404 (Oct) a house was sold by H, and to his advantage, for appreciably more than its valuation at the time of the ancillary relief hearing. He had carried out an extensive amount of refurbishment. In those circumstances Sir Mark Potter P held that the increase in price was “by no means inordinate given the value of the works effected by the husband”. He refused W's Barder application.

Barder had concerned a mother who retained the parties' former home under a consent order, then unlawfully killed the two

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll