header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007 / David Burrows
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Finance on family breakdown

Validity of a post-nuptial agreement

NA v MA [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) (Jan), Baron J attracted comment in the press and has already featured in NLJ. It was a truly sad story, though for once the solicitors’ profession came out of it better than the medics and the barristers. The wife (W) had discussed her anxieties with her doctor who promptly discussed them with her overbearing husband and members of the Bar seem to have done little to smooth the court’s path to judgment.

The main legal issue revolved around the efficacy of a “post nuptial agreement”, that is to say an agreement on the basis of which the parties were intended to resume cohabitation. The agreement had been negotiated whilst the parties were still in the throes of dealing with a very difficult relationship. The husband, the judge said, had offered the agreement on a “take it or leave it basis” as the only way to achieve a reconciliation in the marriage. The parties were still living together

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll