header-logo header-logo

Finance on family breakdown

31 May 2007 / David Burrows
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Validity of a post-nuptial agreement

NA v MA [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) (Jan), Baron J attracted comment in the press and has already featured in NLJ. It was a truly sad story, though for once the solicitors’ profession came out of it better than the medics and the barristers. The wife (W) had discussed her anxieties with her doctor who promptly discussed them with her overbearing husband and members of the Bar seem to have done little to smooth the court’s path to judgment.

The main legal issue revolved around the efficacy of a “post nuptial agreement”, that is to say an agreement on the basis of which the parties were intended to resume cohabitation. The agreement had been negotiated whilst the parties were still in the throes of dealing with a very difficult relationship. The husband, the judge said, had offered the agreement on a “take it or leave it basis” as the only way to achieve a reconciliation in the marriage. The parties were still living together

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
Family lawyers have welcomed government plans to repeal the presumption of parental involvement from the Children Act 1989, but emphasised the need for each case to be determined on its facts
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
Defendant lawyers are ‘routinely dangling’ the prospect of a fundamental dishonesty argument ‘as a tactic to instil fear and to discourage’ claimants, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) has warned.
Criminal silk Richard Wright KC will lead an urgent independent review of stalking laws, the Home Office has announced
Wills disputes have surged 61% in five years as relatives grow more willing to fight legal battles over larger inheritance pots
back-to-top-scroll