header-logo header-logo

Financial fear drives couples to court

24 July 2019
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Brexit , Mediation
printer mail-detail
The number of court disputes between divorcing couples over money has risen 20% to 3,176 cases in the past year.

The upward trend in court cases comes despite rising legal fees and the government-led push towards meditation―currently, all divorce applicants must attend a mediation session before issuing court proceedings.

However, family lawyers attribute the rise to heightened financial stress in the economy and Brexit uncertainty, making people more likely to fight for their share of the marital assets.

James Ferguson, partner at family law firm Boodle Hatfield, warned that legal fees for litigation will deplete the pot of assets, while delays in the family courts can leave couples in limbo. Ministry of Justice figures show it takes an average of 59 weeks to obtain a decree absolute.

Ferguson said: ‘We would encourage clients only to litigate a divorce through court if all the other options have been exhausted. The costs and time involved in pursuing a financial remedy case through the Family Court seem to rise inexorably.’

Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Brexit , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll