header-logo header-logo

24 July 2019
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Brexit , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Financial fear drives couples to court

The number of court disputes between divorcing couples over money has risen 20% to 3,176 cases in the past year.

The upward trend in court cases comes despite rising legal fees and the government-led push towards meditation―currently, all divorce applicants must attend a mediation session before issuing court proceedings.

However, family lawyers attribute the rise to heightened financial stress in the economy and Brexit uncertainty, making people more likely to fight for their share of the marital assets.

James Ferguson, partner at family law firm Boodle Hatfield, warned that legal fees for litigation will deplete the pot of assets, while delays in the family courts can leave couples in limbo. Ministry of Justice figures show it takes an average of 59 weeks to obtain a decree absolute.

Ferguson said: ‘We would encourage clients only to litigate a divorce through court if all the other options have been exhausted. The costs and time involved in pursuing a financial remedy case through the Family Court seem to rise inexorably.’

Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Brexit , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll