header-logo header-logo

04 September 2015
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Financial services

Financial Conduct Authority v Da Vinci Invest Ltd [2015] EWHC 2401 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 77 (Aug)

The present was the first case in which, in addition to seeking an injunction under s 381 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, the claimant Financial Conduct Authority invited the court to impose a penalty for market abuse under s 129 of the Act. The Chancery Division gave guidance on the relevant statutory provisions, and granted injunctions and penalties against the defendants.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll