header-logo header-logo

22 June 2018 / Michel Reznik
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Financial Services Tribunal: for justice, for business confidence (Pt 2)

nlj_7798_reznik

Michel Reznik explains why the Financial Services Tribunal will work for the financial services industry & ‘UK plc’

  • SMEs need affordable access to a primary dispute resolution forum to re-establish consumer confidence in credit markets to pre-financial crisis levels.
  • Historical examples establish that the financial industry benefits from offering its customers favourable dispute resolution terms, as they boost the market confidence that underpins economic growth.
  • The financial industry should therefore encourage government to establish a Financial Services Tribunal as a means to stimulate consumer confidence and a return to growth in SME lending.

In previous New Law Journal issues I summarised the ‘access to justice’ case for a Financial Services Tribunal (FST) made by Richard Samuel in three articles he published in the Capital Markets Law Journal . It is now well-understood and widely, if not universally, accepted that SMEs need a more accessible primary dispute resolution forum (PDR) than is afforded by the courts if they are to have a real chance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll