header-logo header-logo

22 June 2018 / Michel Reznik
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Financial Services Tribunal: for justice, for business confidence (Pt 2)

nlj_7798_reznik

Michel Reznik explains why the Financial Services Tribunal will work for the financial services industry & ‘UK plc’

  • SMEs need affordable access to a primary dispute resolution forum to re-establish consumer confidence in credit markets to pre-financial crisis levels.
  • Historical examples establish that the financial industry benefits from offering its customers favourable dispute resolution terms, as they boost the market confidence that underpins economic growth.
  • The financial industry should therefore encourage government to establish a Financial Services Tribunal as a means to stimulate consumer confidence and a return to growth in SME lending.

In previous New Law Journal issues I summarised the ‘access to justice’ case for a Financial Services Tribunal (FST) made by Richard Samuel in three articles he published in the Capital Markets Law Journal . It is now well-understood and widely, if not universally, accepted that SMEs need a more accessible primary dispute resolution forum (PDR) than is afforded by the courts if they are to have a real chance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll