header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018 / Michel Reznik
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Financial Services Tribunal: for justice, for business (Pt 1)

nlj_7787_reznik

In a new series, Michel Reznik reports on increased support for the Financial Services Tribunal & the momentum for change

  • A Financial Services Tribunal (FST) should be established to adjudicate claims of small and medium sized enterprises.
  • This initiative is gaining momentum through the support of journalists, APPG and Members of Parliament.
  • FST would work alongside and in conjunction with the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).

The initiative to establish a Financial Services Tribunal (FST) in England and Wales has been gathering momentum. For readers not yet familiar with FST: it is a proposal to create a system, modelled on the employment tribunals, that is aimed at resolving disputes in the financial services sector. It would operate alongside the two existing dispute resolution systems and primarily be aimed to hear matters that fall into the gap between them: the Financial Ombudsman Services’ present remit at the lower end (£150,000) and the point at which it becomes economic to launch a claim in the High Court (several

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll