header-logo header-logo

21 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fine-tuning judges’ pensions

The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on its proposals to change judicial pensions

The draft Judicial Pensions (Amendment) Regulations 2024 propose amendments to a range of regulations and orders. These include introducing an employer cost cap in the Judicial Pension Scheme 2022 in order to comply with the Public Service Pensions Act 2013. The draft 2024 regulations would also expand the list of judges eligible to receive pensions under the fee-paid judicial pension scheme regulations and the judicial offices order. 

The fee-paid judicial pension scheme began in 2017, following the Supreme Court’s decision in O’Brien v Ministry of Justice [2013] UKSC 6 that fee-paid judges were treated less favourably than full-time salaried judges because they did not receive a pension. It closed to further accruals, as did all other judicial pension schemes, in 2022 to be replaced by the Judicial Pension Scheme 2022.

The ‘Judicial Pensions (Amendment) Regulations 2024: consultation on the draft regulations’ runs until 14 April and can be viewed here.

Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll