header-logo header-logo

Fine-tuning judges’ pensions

21 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on its proposals to change judicial pensions

The draft Judicial Pensions (Amendment) Regulations 2024 propose amendments to a range of regulations and orders. These include introducing an employer cost cap in the Judicial Pension Scheme 2022 in order to comply with the Public Service Pensions Act 2013. The draft 2024 regulations would also expand the list of judges eligible to receive pensions under the fee-paid judicial pension scheme regulations and the judicial offices order. 

The fee-paid judicial pension scheme began in 2017, following the Supreme Court’s decision in O’Brien v Ministry of Justice [2013] UKSC 6 that fee-paid judges were treated less favourably than full-time salaried judges because they did not receive a pension. It closed to further accruals, as did all other judicial pension schemes, in 2022 to be replaced by the Judicial Pension Scheme 2022.

The ‘Judicial Pensions (Amendment) Regulations 2024: consultation on the draft regulations’ runs until 14 April and can be viewed here.

Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll