header-logo header-logo

22 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Fines hike for solicitors & law firms

Proposals to fine firms up to 5% of their annual turnover for breaches of the professional rule book have been confirmed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

While fixed penalties of £750 or £1,500 will be charged for low-level misconduct, such as failing to publish the required costs or complaints information, fines for both individuals and firms for more serious breaches will be based on percentages of gross income or turnover. These would range from 0.2% to 5%.

The SRA intends to pilot the use of personal impact statements in cases of sexual misconduct, discrimination or harassment. It will also publish information on disciplinary decisions for longer periods, ranging from three years for warnings and fines to permanently for strike-off decisions.

The new regime is due to take effect on 30 May, subject to Legal Services Board approval.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: 'When we need to step in and take action it is important that we have a transparent and effective disciplinary approach in place.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Pandemic, sanctions, armed conflict, blocked shipping corridors, transport disruption... in these uncertain times, every successful commercial entity must ensure they have an effective force majeure clause in place. But how exactly do you ensure this? 
back-to-top-scroll