header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dr Nicholas Roberts
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Fire safety post-Grenfell

nlj_7763_roberts

Nicholas Roberts explores the practicalities of assigning responsibility for fire safety in long leasehold flats

  • Legislative reform on fire safety is likely to be introduced in response to the Grenfell Tower disaster.
  • Technical legal difficulties arise when deciding who is responsible for what.
  • Under the ‘light touch’ regulations introduced in 2005, risks are usually exposed by an independent risk assessment, which does not have the status of a statutory authority.

The tragedy at Grenfell Tower has focused attention on the fire risks involved with multi-storey blocks of flats, and it seems likely that stronger legislative measures will be introduced to address the fire safety issues. This may, therefore, be an appropriate time to consider some of the ways in which the current legal provisions relating to fire safety measures are either failing to address the problems of long leasehold flats, or make it difficult for those with the responsibility for managing flats to make recommended changes. The problems seem to originate from two main sources:

  • Any survey of fire precautions will rightly
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll