header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dr Nicholas Roberts
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Fire safety post-Grenfell

nlj_7763_roberts

Nicholas Roberts explores the practicalities of assigning responsibility for fire safety in long leasehold flats

  • Legislative reform on fire safety is likely to be introduced in response to the Grenfell Tower disaster.
  • Technical legal difficulties arise when deciding who is responsible for what.
  • Under the ‘light touch’ regulations introduced in 2005, risks are usually exposed by an independent risk assessment, which does not have the status of a statutory authority.

The tragedy at Grenfell Tower has focused attention on the fire risks involved with multi-storey blocks of flats, and it seems likely that stronger legislative measures will be introduced to address the fire safety issues. This may, therefore, be an appropriate time to consider some of the ways in which the current legal provisions relating to fire safety measures are either failing to address the problems of long leasehold flats, or make it difficult for those with the responsibility for managing flats to make recommended changes. The problems seem to originate from two main sources:

  • Any survey of fire precautions will rightly
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll