header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dr Nicholas Roberts
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Fire safety post-Grenfell

nlj_7763_roberts

Nicholas Roberts explores the practicalities of assigning responsibility for fire safety in long leasehold flats

  • Legislative reform on fire safety is likely to be introduced in response to the Grenfell Tower disaster.
  • Technical legal difficulties arise when deciding who is responsible for what.
  • Under the ‘light touch’ regulations introduced in 2005, risks are usually exposed by an independent risk assessment, which does not have the status of a statutory authority.

The tragedy at Grenfell Tower has focused attention on the fire risks involved with multi-storey blocks of flats, and it seems likely that stronger legislative measures will be introduced to address the fire safety issues. This may, therefore, be an appropriate time to consider some of the ways in which the current legal provisions relating to fire safety measures are either failing to address the problems of long leasehold flats, or make it difficult for those with the responsibility for managing flats to make recommended changes. The problems seem to originate from two main sources:

  • Any survey of fire precautions will rightly
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll