header-logo header-logo

08 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Firearms offences: consultation

The Sentencing Council is consulting on a range of draft guidelines for possessing, carrying, making or transferring firearms

Firearms offences can result in life imprisonment, while some offences require a minimum sentence of five years, and others a maximum of ten years. However, there are currently no sentencing guidelines in the Crown Court and only one for use in magistrates’ courts. 

Sentencing Council member Mrs Justice Maura McGowan said: ‘The legislation is complex and we know that judges and magistrates will welcome guidelines in this difficult area of sentencing.

‘These draft guidelines cover a range of offending relating to the possession, manufacturing and transferring of firearms and aim to provide a structured framework for courts to ensure a consistent approach to sentencing that meets the seriousness of the offending.’

The consultation ends on 14 January 2020.

Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll